Understanding the concept of ‘I’ as the equilibrium of mind can be explored through various psychological theories. The idea that intelligence arises as a result of our efforts to understand the Spirit of Law, and the notion that ‘I,’ the Impersonal Self, is the master of personality, aligns with the framework of equilibrium discussed in psychological and cognitive theories.

Carl Rogers, a prominent figure in psychology, posited that the path to self-actualization is interrupted when there is a disequilibrium between people’s perceptions of their real self and their ideal self. This disequilibrium can be addressed through therapies that focus on self-insight, highlighting the role of ‘I’ in achieving a state of equilibrium where one’s self-perception aligns with their aspirations, leading to self-actualization​​.[“]

Jean Piaget’s theory further enriches this understanding by presenting equilibrium as a state where existing knowledge (schemas) is in balance with new information. This balance is crucial for cognitive development, as it enables an individual to integrate new insights harmoniously with what they already know, fostering a coherent understanding of the world. Disequilibrium, then, is seen as a catalyst for cognitive growth, pushing the individual to adapt and evolve their cognitive frameworks​​. [“]

This dialog about ‘I’ being the equilibrium of mind echoes the notion that the self is a dynamic field of potentiality, constantly balancing between known and unknown, stability and change. It suggests that the self or ‘I’ is not a static entity but a process of continuous adaptation and growth, propelled by the interplay of equilibrium and disequilibrium.

For more detailed insights into these theories, exploring the works of Carl Rogers and Jean Piaget would provide a deeper understanding of how ‘I’ functions as the equilibrium of the mind in the landscape of psychological development.

The ‘I’ embodies the essence of being that transcends mere existence, representing the light within the mind, the true self, and the inner soul. This concept suggests a profound understanding of identity that is not limited to the physical or mental aspects of being but encompasses a deeper, more intrinsic nature.

1. Active ‘I’: The active aspect of ‘I’ pertains to its role in initiating thoughts, actions, and decisions. It is the ‘doer’ within us, engaging with the external world, making choices, and exerting free will. This active ‘I’ is responsible for the dynamism of life, propelling us forward in our endeavors and interactions.
2. Passive ‘I’: Conversely, the passive aspect of ‘I’ reflects our capacity to receive, perceive, and be influenced by external stimuli. It embodies our receptiveness to new ideas, emotions, and experiences. In this state, the ‘I’ acts as a mirror, reflecting the world without judgment or intervention, allowing for introspection and deeper understanding.
3. Equilibrium of ‘I’: The equilibrium between the active and passive aspects of ‘I’ denotes a state of balance where there is harmony between doing and being, acting and receiving. This balance allows for a holistic engagement with life, where action is informed by deep reflection, and passive experiences enrich our active pursuits. It is in this equilibrium that the ‘I’ finds its true power, navigating life with wisdom and grace.

The interplay between these aspects of ‘I’ illustrates the complexity of our inner lives and the potential for growth and transformation. It speaks to the idea that our true essence lies beyond the binary of activity and passivity, residing instead in a balanced state that fosters a deeper connection with the self and the world. This understanding of ‘I’ as the light within encourages an exploration of our inner depths, guiding us towards self-realization and the illumination of our true nature.

Source: InnerIGPT

Stay in the NOW with Inner I Network;

---